At the start of the new millennium the challenge for flexible people is to see recent evolution in perspective in a paradigm for the 21st century. And to start realizing (with a shock) that: war on terrorism is a next cold war Evolution found two ways of using creativity. The BamBam appraoch (male focused injection of energy), and the Marilyn Monroe approach (strangling through relaxing). The male approach if overdone leads to wars, tornado's, disasters. The female approach if overdone leads to addiction. Babies show: a balanced mix of anger and smiling is very successful. But after dinosaurs, sharks, crocodiles, pharaos, emperors. And after snakes, whales and Mother Maries a new kind of leader arrived, selected an simple characteristic 'respect' (think of the English king Lionheart). Warring societies slurped much more resources than cultures based on Respect. With Power only as a tool to defend own values, and dosed relaxation only for feeling 'one big family'. Under these 'nobles' life of 'the poor' still needed a lot of improvement. Most Royal Families though were respected and functioned reasonably well in supplying both safety and family feeling. That egoism/individualism resulted in slavery, as seen in apartheid and in hunting other humans as predators in 2 world wars, was no coincidence. Now more subtle the same egoist individualism is known as capitalism. Time for Western human animals to realize that they run straight toward fascism .

stalin truman and churchill powergames using human lives

Seen this way before WWI the Western World consisted of many small differently colored wolves, dominated by around 9 bigger predators. Already based on power balance as created by 'the new rich'. Six of this cluster were the German, British, French, Austrian-Hungarian Italian and Spanish wolves. They could be called the big six predators. Huge wolves outside Europe were the US, Russia, the Ottoman Empire, The Persian Empire, India, Japan and China. Communist Russia was a muscle power, no land of wisdom. Capitalist US is a land aiming for individual Glory, no land of Hope.
There was not yet a globalization, like at present. Learn how two not very smart big 'Terminators' with a lot of help from hungry wolf Great Britain succeeded in ripping apart in one complex action their much more clever nephews Europe, China, India, Japan and the Ottoman and Persian Empires.

Start of WWI The Persian Empire immediately declared to be neutral. Though it heavily sympathized with the forces around Germany. Not only because Turkey was Muslim territory, but also because it had enough reasons to distrust the power addicted 'beasts' Russia and UK.

During World War I Jordan joined the British against the Ottomans. In July 1917 the army of Prince Faysal ibn Husayn (of the Hashimite dynasty) captured Al-'Aqabah, and by October 1918 Amman and Damascus were in Allied hands. In 1920 the mandate over Palestine, was given to Great Britain, and that over Syria, went to France. This effectively separated the area then occupied by Israel and Jordan from that of Syria (Israel and Jordan acting pro UK and US has historical reasons).

Or how the scrude wolf UK indirectly THOUGHT to succeed in beating all other wolves. The political fear of Europe of this agressive island predator is HUGE. Wolves are beautiful animals, but take care. Better through a sexual revolution breed them into Huskies.

The European wolves were not hungry, but nevertheless extremely greedy. After World War I the formerly tremendously big German wolf (including the huge Austria-Hungary) was temporarily unconscious and the from start bigger US and Soviet Russian animals were quickly growing to super power wolves. The until then tough French wolf was crippled and the British wolf wanted to prove that it still was a power player.

The Great Game (super theft) After WWI Tsarist Russia and the British Empire in what Kipling called the "Great Game" under pretence of 'liberating' minimized the Ottoman Empire and the impartial Persian Empire. The Ottomans in the past were already forced to 'give away' Greece and Egypt. Ending WWI the still vast Ottoman Empire was again 'cut', this time to modern Turkey. These lumps were 'randomly' chosen (contained huge oil reserves), and caused for instance the Kurdish problem, The Armenian Problem, The Palestine Problem, and the establishing of the independent wolf states Syria and Iraq. Britain was in a hurry to confiscate Palestine and also immediately made a hunting reservate of Iraq. Where is England now there are HUGE problems? At present the US wolf with help of hunting dog England tries to reshape Iraq to a Western wolf. Let me remind: Iraq was part of the Turkish Ottoman Gray Wolf Empire from 1534 to 1918, but after 14 years of British rule FORCED independence. In similar way the Persian Empire was robbed of the HUGE 'pieces' Bahrain, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Afghanistan (with no excuse but greed).

One supposes greed to be satisfied, but the arrogant British Empire got addicted to playing The Great Game (and that way caused all terrorism/freedom-fighting in the Middle East). With help of the greedy fundamentalist former colony US, who sees profit worldwide and wants to cash it with law and order.
After some time the still restless also protestant Germany starts recovering again, in Asia joined an equally restless Japan with in leading military circles in Germany educated engineers . Ready to fight, in a 'protestants for world-power' war..

Then started power hunt WWII. Apart from the evil tophunter Adolf Hitler, the German alpha wolves did not differ at all from for instance the English and the US alpha animals. During WII the US/UK wolves castrated the Italian wolf, and after the war the German wolf was was torn in two pieces. The US alpha wolves didn't dare to risk hunting in Japan, and quite unfair with two atomic bombs in world war two growled a very clear message 'break the fight!' to the Japanese alpha wolves . Cunningly in one blow also destroying the 400 years old layers of the Dutch husky in Japan
The French wolf was scared, because first it was crushed by the expending German wolf and then hardly survived the hard counter attack of his 'friends'. So the European predators were all temporarily not fit for hunt, and already quite weak to be competitive lost a lot of their territory to the attractive dominating big white US and black Russian alpha wolves.

Seen that way the role of the usa in WWII was also a power in a trade war, the USA broke the European economic power in the Pacific and got a foothold in Europe. And second victor was Soviet Russia getting big part of Poland, of Hungary and economic dominance in many neighbouring countries. To consider a trade war a battle between two parties is mystifying. In this case only Japan was in war with the US. But total devastation of Dutch and French influence in the Pacific was aimed for and achieved. And remaining 'fortresses of power' where based on pure power one by one tackled in the early fifties (like Dutch influence in New Guinea).

Then under the cover of fighting communist wolves the capitalist USA wolf started to plunder South America, and severely diminished influence of the Spanish and Portugese wolves.
After WWII the Japanese wolf for a long time was not more than a meagre player, eating leftovers of the dominant USA predator.

After WWII the huge shining white American wolf and the equally huge pitch black Russian wolf began controlling the other animals. The whitish British animal diminished to an agressive little puppy, but was still dominating the European doggies.  A cold war develops, white versus black. The pack is steady, and to obedient to draw attention. From a bit distance you only see and hear the dominating black and white wolves.

Anything that is not black or white is called 'terrorist'. That must be a beautiful color.

Later the US wolf 'ate' the Soviet Russian wolf. It was like a commercial for wash powder. The innocent shining white Christian Angels (of Death) defeat the corrupt dirty black Communist Beasts.
But it was also the start of growth of a blueish very muscled continental European wolfdog. The little white British puppy rapidly shrinks to poodle size, only in a tactical role it may still participate. Used to play in top of competition, it can't decide between merging with the extending close blue European wolfdog or being disqualified because of cheating (the common sense definition of the political notion 'tactics').

The also medium sized green and yellow Australian coyote seldom takes part in the power hunt.
A peaceful but gigantic yellow Buddhist bear enters the game stealthy like a yellow elephant, and again Japan is an important sponsor. The reddish Muslim saluki hunting dog prolongs power life  by by drinking oil and breathing fire. A big but peaceful Brazilian bulldog is tactically joining the tiny South-American ones. For the first time since long a brown   African heyena of crocodile quality enters the hunt. A colorful pack again.

The whitish US wolf is still in size and strength proudly dominating the now restless  multicolored pack but has stopped gaining size, and even gets black spots. And though the US wolf is more scaring, the total group is an awful lot stronger. and in numbers the Western wolves face an unequal fight.

IF they would play together the pack of non western wolves would easily beat the graying US wolves.

ALL  races of wolves united to me seem to make a super pack.

What I'm trying to say is: it's rational to see things divided in 'good' and 'bad'. It was caused by introducing the Greek doctrine of split mind and body in Roman Catholic Christian thinking (see the mind-body-problem). This is the essential difference with the Coptic Christian Church, that follows the doctrine of unity of mind and body. As well do Buddhism and less clear Islam. Emperor of Ethiopia Haile Selassie was practicing ideas out of Coptic Christian belief. He inspired admired people like Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King. I'm no Christian, but this seriously made me think. The 'Western' kind of thinking in split body and soul allows distinguishing 'mind work' and 'bodily work'. In catholic thinking in this way the mind (soul) became divine and the body human. That's why sex was considered dirty, but because of freedom of speech you could say sexually horrible things. This lead to egoistic thinking like: who's not choosing my side, must be against me. Besides the logic rationality Western politics needs a much more substantial use of the more complex logic common sense.

In the conflict Israel-Palestine we see 2 cultures in a fight. The world has thousands of antropologers, does rationally playing power games prevent them from seeing with common sense the effects of 2 cultures behaving mainly parallel? That results in a social volcano, at present active. You just need to wait for the eruption (paradigm clash). The outcome of a cultural revolution is unpredictable.

Consider cultural chaos as a cultural storm. Then try to imagine what kind of structures would survive.
Let me give a hint: the building material 'power' is awfully rigid and eats findish cultures like a 'black hole'. Much more flexible and relative is using 'respect'.

In a cultural storm first those organizations fundamented on mainly power are blown away like cardhouses. The ones though based on respect show extreme flexibility. See 'fundamental power' as being stone, and 'respect' as chewing gum. 'Fundamental Power', being traditional, keeps it's strenght only in constant 'power circumstances'. Respect keeps strenghth in a huge range of power. Cultural storms (also called revolutions or paradigm shifts) strike 'fundamental power', because of changing the power balance. Fundamental power houses collapse.

A major cultural storm is the start of a very long period of social stability. New absolute systems are being constructed. Much later when such a system has burned most of the in this thought world present constructive fuel creativity, then again relative forces increase. This ends in the next social eruption.

Social systems based on 'respect' can resist cultural tornados

Monist Value:Money or Power, Result = War

Looking for the most used search-words on Internet in the USA I noticed that very high scoring words were: 'money' and 'war'.
Not as high as sex, but very high.
Top search-words related to war: world war 2, civil war, war, world war 1, Vietnam war, Iraq war, dope war, war in Iraq, cold war, Korean war, world war, gulf war, war on drug, war on terrorism, total war, second world war, Mexican war.
Top search-words related to money: money love, make money, free money, cash money, easy money, money to loan, fast money, make money fast.

That was an eye-opener to understanding USA society, American values are focused on possession of money and its short history is filled with devastating wars.
It is nor really surprising, because most early immigrants were obsessed by 'a better life', and many of them ready to kill for it. Such people didn't leave Europe to find a more beautiful life, but to produce a more wealthy life. The value property is highly devoted in capitalist thinking. Nothing should prevent this goal; no Red Indians; no government; no Mexicans; no Germans; no communists; no Chinese; no Muslims.

When the USA doesn't change direction, that leaves to 2 options: (1) A world with only USA (total capitalism), (2) a world without USA (total war).
I don't think 1 is acceptable.

Anywhere around the world you find 'rational hunters'. When somewhere is wealth then 'rational hunters' are not far away. It's as if they smell wealth. They are feared all over the globe. When hunting in 'rational' way everything is allowed. Mind that 'rationality' is a Roman Catholic Christian logic. I.e. 'rational' hunting (religious or not) is religious war (genocide in stealthy shape). Rational hunting is a heritage of the Roman Empire. In the end what only counts is the goal wealth. It's not Christian in the way meant by Jesus to practive slavery and use Capitalist laws in murdering for money, but that ethics is evaded easily. Then these fanatic religious warriors under pretence of terrorism shouting Independence! kill 'out of defense'.

'Rational' hunters are not built very well for hunting. That's why they became brilliant in making aids for all kinds of skills. Vision in the dark, smell in the water, very faint sounds ...... are no problem with their tools. They designed a wide range of tools for killing, and vehicles that have them fly as birds. That way even small in size it became the most dangerous predator on earth.

But animal preys are no real threat anymore. It's greatest threats are The Relative Thinking Human and The Emotional Human. The first one is found in Buddhist Cultures, amongst South American Indian mini-cultures and probly still in African Ethiopia, the second one is still well preserved in the Islamic World. And the first is a peaceful type of human, or to weak for attack. So killing can be replaced by 'assimilating'. But The Emotional Human has a sub-race called Muslim Warrior that is worrisome because it has extreme courage. Rational Hunters took the lead in those Islamic parts of the world where those potentially dangerous preys are still surviving in large numbers. But it appears that their opponents in techniques are The Tigers of Guerilla . Rational Hunters are masters in 'the rule of the fittest', but when it comes to finesse they are more like bone crunching hyenas. And when it comes to courage The Tigers of Guerilla are superior.

To prevent being slaughtered in this hunt asks for rude defense of the technically poor but sure not scarce sub-race of hunted human predators. Wisely the rational hunters themselves don't speak about 'hunting'. Instead they invented the term 'war on terrorism'. That way they suggest that killing mudjaheddin (Muslim Warriors) is saving evolution from 'bad' predators. Sharks in human shape, only sharks at present are supposed to be saved, and mudjaheddin should be killed.


Time for the WNF to blow the whistle. Nature without mudjaheddin is like forests without tigers. Prisons are the worst of all zoo's.

Alexander The Cursed - Hitler The Great
Conqueror of the Ancient World, The ten-horned Beast, Dictator of the Third Reich, Emperor of the Greater Germanic Reich

Love-stories around Alexander the Cursed are twisting history. The myth: Alexander wanted to unite all people with the bonds of peace. Yes, all familiar people, after wiping away all 'strange' people (terrorists). Freedom of speech active as myth-maker.

Hitler considered 'the Jews' as evil, just like Alexander felt that Zoroastrianism was an 'aberration'. In my school time in the sixties Alexander was pointed to as 'The Terrible'. Common sense 'terrible' gradually changed in abstract 'great'.

Alexander the 'Great' was the first horrible example of what the Greek belief in split of mind and body could cause (fully ABSTRACT belief in 'spirits' or 'flying souls').

A major ancient Greek belief was: Human nature is composed of two disparate elements: the evil titanic element (the body), and the divine Dionysian element (the soul). Death as freeing of the divine soul from the evil body, was welcomed.
In record speed Alexander developed to Macedonian super general. He believed his body to be invincible and his soul godlike, and virtually in a series of overwhelming slaughters destroyed the Zoroastrian culture that like Asian cultures believed in unity of body and soul (as true Greek Alexander believed in 'souls' captured in human bodies, and saw the 'unity of body and mind' Zorastrian culture as a 'world of tyranny and oppression'). Not only by military actions, but also by in a kind of inquisition without trials burning and torturing to death practically all Zorastrian 'freethinkers'.

In the late 20th century outside protestant circles in the US and Hollywood the image of Alexander the 'Great' changed to Alexander the Cursed. Just like it was before the World Wars.
Greek thinking was not alone. Alexander was the paranoid power thinker 'Iskander the Cursed ' as described in the history of Persian civilization.

Knowledge: the Greek civilization (mind body split) was brought by the Romans to Europe as Roman Christianity. The abstract manipulating of the Greek body-mind-split resulted in great engineering skills. Original Christianity represented 'Unity of Mind and Body'. I.e. also emotion as in Islam and ethics as in Buddhism.

In a Unicef youth forum I found following text: Iran is a Terror Supporting country. If Iran gets nuclear power [..], Iran will declare war to Israel [..].
The One: Hearsay that enlightens the triumph of education. Personally I'm more concerned about USA fascism and about Iran not daring to defend human values fully, because Israel threatens with nuclear power. Instead of playing the game 'pestering Iran' the Western World might prevent Israel treating Palestinians in fascist ways.
Going on this way a stepchild of Oliver Stone might make a myth around the slightly mad but aimable Hitler the Great (+ angel Eva)
Protestant multinational IBM almost succeeded to clean Google of links to annoying websites abouts the very dubious role of IBM in the Holocaust. Maybe Oliver Stone could make a movie about the charitable capitalist institution IBM.

Power versus Respecting any Life

I found out that some of my sites where visited incognito by the board of companies recycling annually more than a billion bucks. Just by tracing back anonymous IP-addresses. Realizing the DECISIVE utterly dubious role of IBM in the Holocaust, that made me think. Destroying life is against the first rule of evolution: "Honor all life". And earning thousands of bucks never was my ambition. What would be the value for such firms of any shape of life?

If evolution had to make 'the choice' between one being producing variance and a heap of paper, then 'deciding' would be easy. Value is a human made concept, but o.k. the decisive value in evolution is variance (and indirectly the power produced). Evolution is not interested in power itself, but only in the power to produce variance.
Just one example: Roll Royce engines in fighter planes may produce a lot of noise, but also consume vast amounts of fuel and kill millions of members of evolution.
A locally somewhere in space dominant 'power' is considered as lost by evolution when it does not produce significant change anymore in ethics. Then evolution stops spending even one fraction of a second in this in itself entangled power, and starts looking for new ways.

Only help from others can bring this from the outside passive power back into the attention of evolution. Some kind of coalition should make it active again.

Back to earth. Capitalism and all rational absolute doctrines are dead. But they have amazingly strong points. Only coalition with an alive relativist doctrine can save these characteristics. That would mean rationality back to being only 1 out of limitless logics, and very useful in technology. In ethics the relative views common sense or the in Buddhism practiced rules have more future.

The One: I'm an optimistic guy and utterly surprised to notice: Like a starting avalanche Europe is step by step with compromises moving towards WWIII. This time headed by US, Israel and UK, and accompanied by Russia and some government plants in Muslim territory. A next generation of Hitlers (no offense) is one by one developing in European countries. For a change not targeting Jews, but preparing a War on Terrorism.

In Chinese language one of the words for 'soldier' means: 'servant'. 'Servus' the Latin word for servant was indicating a slave