human brain / inteligencia humano / intelligenza umana / intelligence humain / paglalarawan utak
Paradigm Shift: Human Brains as Motor of Sense Rituals
|
|
In very recent evolution the Roman Apes to save slavery (human ape farming) started a split between 'immaterial reality' (Roman Ape Ideas = 'holy spirit') and material reality (behavior = sin) (body-mind split).
Inspired by Aristotle's 'animism'.
(= split between supreme immaterial 'god' = anima and inferior material body).
Like hard drug dealers claiming: our drug 'rationality' produces THE one and only mega-cool Reality. Enlightenment divided reality in religion-science (mind-brain split), 'natural LAW' and 'understanding'. Western human behavior became more consistent through abstract Logic, but use of logic (called 'understanding') also strangled the much more flexible common sense with rational absolutism. 'Rational' junkies since Descartes are 24 hours per day making trip ('mind','reason', 'understanding'), and 'think' to have higher goals than water, food and shelter. Chasing the hallucination 'rich' such mind junkies started murderous exploitation of common sense worlds based on material 'chi' or 'ki'. Westerners formed huge sects of tripping junks of egoism, high with 'superiority'. Evolution always rebalances through some 'disaster'. This time with RECESSION'. Intuition proved tougher than 'science', because it IS the way of Evolution to preserve knowledge of reality and to increase intelligence. Ludwig Wittgenstein already wrote so in 
Philosophical Investigations.In Technology 'googling' works. fine, but not in social ethics. |
Henk Tuten
WHY ?
Though too old for active research I nevertheless
tried to get an intuition how in human evolution something vastly complex like the superfast 'behavior archive'
human brains could
develop. 'DON'T BOTHER ME!', you might say, because to be quite honest, I only
possess a modest bit more than 'Discovery Channel' knowledge about brain
matters. If all viewers of this channel started to write articles, then there
are by far not enough magazines.
But as Freethinker seeing the 'one way road' in physical
research, and the only widening 'canyon' between physical (sensory motor) and psychological
(using the 'rational' myth 'understanding')
approaches, I realized a need for fresh input.
My relative ignorance makes
this amateur article easy reading for most people and also for the monks called 'scientists'.
4 Reasons
Quote Franz Kafka:
A physiologist might give a complete description of the brain and nerve system at a particular time.
But he could never distinguish some of those states as true and others as false.
Nor would he have any idea what to look for if he were asked to do this.
Considering the brain as a DNA-computer is awfully limited.
Without modesty I do honestly believe that my created
model is quite elegant, and not only in my eyes, and that it could in this or
improved shape serve very well future research.
Millions of dollars worth scanners only give insight in physiological workings. Better be more sure about basics.
'Rational' cures sometimes cause death.
I.
The new consistent analogy, forces the young science
Neurology to evaluate
II.
Resembling a neural network
structure it 'easily' allows computer simulation of a human brain in a digital
computer (but purposely I won't elaborate this).
III.
It fits both mathematical and
psychological approaches
IV.
It might very well explain more than the present
dominant model
BECAUSE
The described model only takes
one microscopically known physical unit (basic neuron), two elegant
products of imagination (1, 2 ), and 1 history changing elegant analogy (3).
(0)
Tweurons
. Ability of neurons to form empty
duos; thus to form;
(1)
Memory Tracks
; circuits either being
EMPTY or FULL , i.e. Tweuron or when
full in size depending on stored information; each track is one of the many
dimensions per sense.
(2)
Sense Photo of information; units
in sense movie. Pictures (photographs) of Reality
My guess is that revolutional thinkers like Nietzsche and Wittgenstein
had more tunnels of Intuition to their 'common sense. They became 'seeers' by having a very strong intuition
(like Einstein had a superior intuition in mainly the aspect math). 'Nothing special',
only very clear signals. His brainlob responsible for associating had grown by TRAINING. Not by being genetically much different,
a topthinker TRAINS his sense signal associating 'muscles' (the inferior parietal region). A topwizard (prophet) in creation/use of tunnels of intuition MIGHT cause a Reality Redesign.
'Savant'-like skill doesn't come from training, but from a lot of locally connected memory tracks. Resulting in awfull skill, but no overview.| Henk Tuten: Seeing things from another angle discloses that closing down 'Tunnels of Intuition' results in things like 'loss of emotion (as caused since Enlightenment by rationalism). And results in religious hallucinations like War on Terrorism (which fires the Israel Palestine Conflict). |
| - the 'human animal' is a social animal that is mentally complete between 12 and 16. The knock out of common sense initiated by Enlightenment
and Immanuel Kant drugged human intelligence in a virtual prison of 'law and order' - being social is a result of its pluspoint verbal 'communication' (sound-language) - intuition (archived during evolution with DNA) is already huge at 12 ('primary' and 'secundary' education in period 12 -16 is wasting time) - 'understanding', 'consciousness', the qualifications 'good/better/best' are rational Enlightenment myths - training intelligence in the western world became the religion 'christian science' (present universities with knowledge ceremonies kill creativity) - training of creativity and Critical Thinking (stimulating and steering with relative ethics the talent of 'designing') should really start at say 5 (with supply of basic tools) to reach 'deepest level' at between age 12 and 16. - training of skills can be done afterwards (puzzling). There a lot of expertise available in present 'science'. - training of intelligence at young age. The notion 'adult' needs revising (it meant sexually fullgrown) (Amazing expertise in handling young animals is found in zoo's worldwide and in inspirating people like the crocodile hunter) |
| Opponents of Thomas Kuhn's idea 'Paradigm' often cite: the key to a revolution [read paradigm shift] is not just gaps in the current
'best' theory. A new theory without gaps or with fewer gaps and/or inconsistencies should be proposed.
Like politicians such opponents deny the need for essential change, 'only' observe a general MISUNDERSTANDING of their own 'fantasies' (inherently rather arrogant). Well
nobody forces them to change. Rigid opinions might result in nursery houses full of lonely people though. I'm not going to defend the cristal clear moods that feed my intuition that social science is virtually dead as tool to get a '21st century proof' intuition of life, and that the 21st century paradigm shows a safe way out. Instead I'll give a clairvoyant picture of 'capitalism'. |
| to part II |
|
Paradigm Shift Return to Common Sense |
|
nice overview on onelife.com |
